Brought to you by:

Framer—Build websites with enterprise needs at startup speeds

Customer.io—The customer engagement platform for human messaging

This week’s podcast tackles five questions that all share a common thread: frustration with your manager or your organization. Not outward conflict — more the quiet, grinding kind. The kind where you know something is off, you’re not sure what to do about it, and every obvious move feels like it could make things worse.

The reason I’m hearing so many of these right now isn’t because people suddenly got worse at navigating politics. It’s because the rules of organizational life have changed — and the friction is hitting the people least responsible for it the hardest.

Here’s what’s changed. Organizations are flattening — removing layers, expecting more impact from fewer people, and compressing scope that used to be spread across multiple roles into one. The spectre of layoffs is constant. Not just cyclical layoffs, but structural ones driven by a combination of overhiring in the past few years, slowing growth, and AI making it possible for fewer people to do more. You’re operating under more pressure, with fewer resources, and less certainty about how your role will evolve.

Executives are impacted too — but they’re usually the ones driving these restructurings, not absorbing them. The impact amplifies as it makes its way down the org. ICs and frontline managers are the ones who find themselves reporting to a manager who’s overwhelmed, watching a project they built get handed to another team, or getting reorg’d into a role they didn’t choose. Great people end up stuck with bad managers — not always because those managers lack talent, but because many are ill-equipped to handle this much change at this pace. They don’t have the bandwidth to advocate for you the way they used to. Projects get wrenched away regardless of your competence. Promotions get blocked for structural reasons. And people already feeling overwhelmed and spread too thin start to question whether the company — or even the industry — is worth it.

In this podcast, I picked out five questions from people navigating these themes:

• What do you do when leadership goes dark and you can’t tell if you’re about to be reorg’d out?

• Should you stay for nearly $1M in comp when you’ve been reorg’d into a role that has nothing to do with why you were hired?

• Recent org shifts have meant you’ve hit a ceiling — what’s the point of sacrificing so much for work when you can’t get ahead?

• How do you handle meeting with your boss’s manager when your direct manager is clearly struggling and ineffective?

• You’re leaving a dysfunctional team for a new one — how do you start the new relationship on the right foot without repeating old patterns?

In the past, the typical response to each of these situations was to be direct — cry foul, demand a change, be clear where you stand, escalate to someone who could fix it. That playbook made sense when demand for tech talent was high and companies were competing to retain you. It doesn’t work the same way anymore. The people who navigate org drama well today are strategic about when and how they act — and that’s what creates the opening to play offense later.

Below are the five biggest takeaways. The full podcast goes deeper on each question — it’s worth a listen for the specific advice.

Know When to Hold ‘Em, Know When to Fold ‘Em

The question when you’re caught in org drama isn’t simply stay or go — it’s whether you’re being thoughtful about assessing your current situation, unclouded by how you were viewed in the past.

A VP in this podcast led a major acquisition and then got placed into marketing analytics. A director’s company pivoted to AI agents — an area he doesn’t own. A manager’s promotion was blocked because the role may not exist in two years. In every case, the ground shifted for structural reasons, not performance reasons. And in every case, leadership is offering what they can given their constraints — that placement is the message.

The default framework is straightforward: stay if the role keeps you current, leave if it lets you fall behind. The way we build product is transforming every six months — companies are embracing AI in product development, operating with flatter organizations, and expecting wider individual responsibilities. If your company is investing in these shifts, you’re staying current even if your specific seat isn’t ideal. If it’s not, every quarter you remain is compounding a gap that gets harder to close. You can find yourself obsolete in just a couple of years if you aren’t prioritizing correctly.

Brand matters here — but brand is shifting. It’s no longer just about the selectivity or prestige of the company name. It’s about whether the company builds in a modern way. The more a company is known for successfully staying up to date — adopting AI tooling, shipping faster, rethinking how teams work — the more your next employer will want you. A household name that refuses to transform is becoming less valuable on your resume, not more.

When doesn’t the default apply? When compensation is unusually strong. Stay bonuses and stock run-ups can push your salary far above market in ways that are genuinely hard to walk away from. And sometimes the smart play is to capture that comp — whether it’s a few quarters or even a year or two. It gives you the savings and runway to take more risk later, to choose a smaller, faster-moving company where the upside is real but the base is lower. The tradeoff: if you’re staying for the comp, you have to work extra hard to stay current. That might mean championing change internally — pushing your team to adopt new tools, volunteering for AI-forward projects — or finding a community or side hustle outside of work that keeps you versed in the latest. Comp buys you time, but only if you use that time wisely.

And as we discussed in the podcast, short tenures are more common and more accepted than most people assume. Resume optics is not a reason to stay. When the way we build products is changing this rapidly, staying in the past is more problematic than making a quick jump — especially if you’ve shown tenure in previous roles.

Customer.io—The customer engagement platform for human messaging

Don’t Put People on the Spot Until You’ve Earned the Right

This is the thread running through every question in the podcast, and it’s the single most common mistake I see in org drama. The principle: before you raise something — with your manager, your skip, your new team — ask yourself whether what you’re about to say will back them into a corner. Especially if they can’t or won’t take action on it. If the answer is yes, you should probably avoid it.

When you confront your manager about your job security during a reorg, they’re stuck — they can’t reassure you without lying, and they can’t be honest without starting rumors. When you go around them to the skip without a heads-up, you’ve broken trust they may never give back. When you dump ambitious goals on a new manager before they’ve seen your work, you’ve made a promise you can’t yet back up. The instinct is to be direct, because directness feels like honesty. But directness without leverage is just pressure — and pressure makes people close down, not open up.

This applies to ambitions too. Who doesn’t want to get promoted, get more visibility for their work, and make the pie bigger? Everyone wants these things. A staff engineer in this podcast listed all three as goals on day one with a new manager. The problem isn’t the goals — it’s the timing. Stating them before you’ve delivered anything makes you look out of touch if your first review is anything less than stellar.

The better approach: let your competence do the talking first. In a meeting with your boss’s manager about a struggling direct manager, present as if you were the manager — walk through what’s moving, what’s stuck, what you’d prioritize. Executives hear the subtext. If you’re transferring from a dysfunctional team, your first priority is starting the new relationship on the right foot. Lead with what drove you to make the change, what you want to learn, what you can contribute today. Save the asks for after your first positive review, after the skip has seen you present the work, after the dust settles and you’re still standing. Managing up in this market means making it easy for your manager to advocate for you, not harder.

Keep Your Head Down — Don’t Get Swept Up in the Drama

When organizations are under stress, the gravitational pull toward office politics, gossip, and confrontation is enormous. Someone’s getting reorg’d, someone else got passed over, there’s a rumor about layoffs, your skip cancelled two 1:1s in a row. The instinct is to start asking questions, comparing notes, venting to peers. That’s the dark side. Every hour you spend decoding organizational tea leaves is an hour not spent on the work that actually determines your outcome.

The best 30-day play when things feel unstable is unglamorous: put your head down and deliver. In 50/50 situations where leadership is deciding who stays and who goes, recent strong execution is what tips the scale. You can’t change the outcome, but you can avoid becoming the easy cut. And expressing worry can actually prime your manager to see you as disengaged, even if your performance says otherwise. Anxiety is contagious. Don’t be the person who plants the seed.

If you’re confident an upcoming change will force you to look for a new role, there are advantages to getting ahead of it internally — companies often remove entire teams regardless of individual contribution, so early awareness helps land a role before the music stops. But externally, there’s little advantage to jumping the gun on interviewing. It’s distracting and dilutes your focus. Companies are usually motivated to make organizational changes quickly since uncertainty is a distraction for everyone. Focus on your work and let it play out.

One related point that didn’t come up in the podcast but is worth saying: when people are laid off, the natural instinct is to hide it. You don’t have to advertise that you’re out of work on LinkedIn. But never lie in an interview. Be upfront that you were part of an org change, if it comes up. Most strong tech companies backchannel candidates, and when they see exaggerations or inaccuracies, they rarely continue the process.

Build the Relationships You’ll Need for a Rainy Day — Today

When things go dark in your organization, the people who get advance intelligence aren’t the ones who suddenly start asking the right questions. They’re the ones who already have a cross-functional peer they can pull aside and say, “What are you hearing?” If you only invested in your manager and your skip, you’ve built a single point of failure — and in this market, that chain breaks more often than it holds.

Building these relationships takes time and generosity. It means offering to help, sharing knowledge, making introductions — without an outcome or a transaction in mind. Over time, these small investments compound into genuine relationships that can be harnessed when you most need them: when the reorg is coming, when you need a reference, when you’re trying to figure out whether the grass is actually greener. When the rainy day comes — and in this environment, it’s when, not if — you can’t manufacture trust on the spot.

Protect What Matters Before the Market Decides for You

One of the questions in this podcast came from a manager who had VP sponsorship, calibration approval for her director promotion, and still got blocked — because leadership doesn’t want to create roles that might not exist in two years. She’s also a burned-out mother of young children with more than ten years of savings. And the question underneath her question was: do I even want to keep climbing?

That question is more common than people admit, and org drama has a way of forcing it to the surface. When the promotion contract is broken, when the system isn’t rewarding your effort the way it used to, the burnout that follows isn’t about workload — it’s about the gap between what you gave up and what you got back.

Work is going to continue to push you to your limits at a pace that’s barely sustainable. That’s the reality. So instead of waiting for the breaking point, prioritize the things you’re giving up for work — now. Health, kids, relationships, whatever you’ve been deferring. The counterintuitive advice: take 10-15% off the gas and see if you can still perform at the same level. Use AI tools to reclaim hours. Cut the bottom 5-10% of your calendar. Not because ambition is bad, but because when org drama does hit and you get stuck, you don’t want to have given up so much that you feel malice toward your employer. That’s what drives people out of the industry entirely. Protecting what matters to you outside of work is what makes the work sustainable.

The Playbook

If there’s one theme connecting all five questions, it’s that the people who survive org drama are strategic about when and how they act.

• If you’re caught in a situation that’s changed, be thoughtful about assessing where you really stand — and be honest about whether you’re staying for the right reasons or out of habit.

• If you want something from your manager or skip, earn the right first — let your work create the leverage, then have the conversation.

• If the organization is under stress, don’t get pulled into the drama — put your head down and deliver.

• If you need allies, don’t wait until you’re in trouble — build the relationships now, with generosity, that you’ll need when it matters.

• If the system isn’t rewarding your effort, protect what matters to you outside of work before the market pushes you past your limits.

Navigate the drama. Don't let it navigate you.

Have your own career question? Get personalized guidance at Nikhyl.AI — it’s where the questions keep coming, and where I’ll keep sharing what I’m learning.