The world is more interesting than the headlines suggest, and the people who see that don’t wait for consensus. The pessimists have been wrong about every transformative technology in history. They were wrong about the camera, the bicycle, books, manned flight, music, radio, the internet, and they’re wrong about AI. New technologies expand the world, and the gap between the catastrophist and the early mover is where opportunity has always lived. Seeing the gap requires a trained disposition. That’s the optimist’s edge. And it’s learnable.

Special thanks to Propellic for sponsoring this edition of the newsletter:

Propellic is the leading travel marketing agency built for how people discover travel today. We help travel brands thrive through SEO, paid media, and AI-driven visibility across platforms like ChatGPT. Our recent work helped G Adventures achieve double-digit organic growth and improved rankings for high-intent search terms by aligning organic and paid strategies. Ready to turn clicks into bookings?

Book a meeting to start your journey. Let’s grow.

1. After craft, what?

Pete Flint at NFX uses photography to explain the possible impact of AI. When the camera arrived in 1839, painters panicked. Painting didn’t die. It exploded into Impressionism, Cubism, photojournalism, amateur photography, street photography, instant prints, and each disruption added layers. The game got bigger.

The same pattern is forming now. Flint maps out a hierarchy worth internalizing. Execution is getting automated. Craft is getting commoditized. Even taste (knowing what has worked before) will eventually be a learnable signal for AI. What survives is expression: a genuine point of view on what could be.

He gives the example of Picasso. He mastered realism first, then discarded it for something nobody wanted, until it became one of the most important paintings in history. He was using “skill” as a floor, then pushing toward something only he could make. The founders who pull ahead will do the same: treat commoditized execution as table stakes, and compete on what only they can see. Read + NFX

2. The jobs that don't exist yet

The fear of AI taking jobs is real, but it’s also misdirected.

US census data shows roughly 60% of the jobs people do today didn’t exist in 1940 as distinct occupations. New technologies created whole new categories of work.

The numbers looking forward are just as striking. The World Economic Forum's Future of Jobs Report 2025 projects 170 million new roles created and 92 million displaced by 2030, a net gain of 78 million roles. They also estimate that around 65% of today’s primary school students will end up working in jobs that don’t yet exist.

What we call “fear of AI job loss” is mostly fear of current job loss, which is understandable. But the historical pattern is consistent: automation reshapes and expands work, retiring old roles while creating new ones at scale. AI looks like a continuation of that pattern; faster, but not different in kind.

The disruption is real, but the ending isn’t.

3. The panic and the pattern

Every new technology triggers a moral panic. Marc Andreessen traces it back to Socrates, who thought written language was a mistake. The bicycle got its own version in the 1880s, when the press warned that young women who rode them would develop “bicycle face,” a permanent grimace from exertion that would make them unmarriageable. Jazz was going to corrupt youth. And so was rock and roll, hip-hop, the internet…each one was going to ruin everything.

The technologies change, but the panic is identical. What repeats is the reaction to disruption, and that reaction drives clicks and headlines.

AI is no different. But what makes this moment harder to read is that even the people closest to a technology often misunderstand where it’s going. Edison invented the phonograph and was certain its primary use would be religious sermons, envisioning families gathered around the device at night listening to preachers. The world had other ideas: music. The inventor of the technology that would reshape global culture and spawn entire industries had completely misread where it was going. Even Wozniak (Apple co-founder) publicly doubted the usefulness of computers.

In 1839, when the daguerreotype (the first publicly adopted photographic process) debuted in Paris, most portrait painters concluded their craft was finished. Samuel Morse, himself a painter and inventor of the telegraph, saw it differently. In a speech to the National Academy of Design, he called it “undoubtedly destined to produce a great revolution in art” and urged artists to understand its influence rather than fear it.

Most saw the end and Morse saw the beginning.

The gap between the catastrophist and the early mover tends to be where opportunity lives.

4 We've been here before

When you see these types of headlines…

Remember that history rhymes.

5. Air travel didn’t escape the trend

In 1903, the New York Times predicted manned flight would take between 1 and 10 million years. 9 weeks later, the Wright Brothers flew at Kitty Hawk. Once flight was proven possible, critics called it a rich man’s toy.

When Kennedy announced the moonshot, opponents coined “moondoggle” (a wasteful government vanity project, in American slang). Even Eisenhower (who created NASA) called anyone spending $40 billion to reach the moon “nuts.” When the moon landing finally came, a teacher’s union organizer went to bed early, calling it “a trivial prestige exercise.”

The full arc of every transformative technology: impossible → wasteful → obvious

The Pessimist Archive has the receipts.

6. The acceleration trap

The historical pattern has been that transformative technologies expand, not contract, the world of work. The pessimists have been wrong in the long run. But the short run is more complicated. A new HBR study tracked AI adoption at a 200-person tech company over eight months. AI didn’t reduce work. It intensified it. Workers moved faster, took on broader scope, and voluntarily extended work into hours that used to be off. Many participants felt busier than before they used AI. The mechanism is that speed raises expectations → higher expectations increase AI reliance → more reliance widens scope → wider scope creates more work.

The arc of AI adoption may end well, but the path there has a burnout risk that most companies are not yet anticipating.

7. You see what you believe

Nir Eyal on the Modern Wisdom podcast talks about how your beliefs shape your interpretation of the world, and they also predetermine what you see in it.

Two groups were asked to count photos in a specially designed newspaper. Self-identified pessimists averaged 2.5 minutes. Self-identified optimists averaged 11 seconds. On page two, a caption read “there are 48 photos in this newspaper.” Optimists saw it and collected their prize. Pessimists counted the photos one by one, never seeing the answer staring them in the face.

The same mechanism runs in reverse. In the Dartmouth Scar Study, women had a realistic fake scar applied to their faces. Before entering a room, researchers secretly removed it without them knowing. They reported being stared at, discriminated against, and made uncomfortable…for a scar that no longer existed. They expected a response and found it everywhere.

Hans Rosling gave university professors an exam on the actual state of the world (education, health, democracy, female empowerment, etc…). They scored worse than monkeys. Their existing beliefs made the evidence invisible.

Successful entrepreneurs see opportunities that others walk past. Not because they are smarter, but because they expect to find them. If you are looking for $100 bills on the floor, you will find them. If you are looking for reasons it won’t work, you will find those too.

8. The end of the middleman

One way to train your eye toward opportunity is to choose your sources deliberately. For most of history, if you wanted to understand what a founder was building and why, you had to trust a journalist to translate it for you, with all their biases, deadlines, and narratives intact. That era is over.

“Every company is a media company now. You should be publishing your own content, direct to your own blog, social media... I really don’t like this idea of putting information out through a traditional journalist who’s going to bring their own bias and filter to it.” — Brian Armstrong, founder of Coinbase, on the David Senra podcast

We are living through a golden age of primary sources. Founders and entrepreneurs talk directly to millions. No filters, less spin, and no headline written before the reporting begins.

Read the books, listen to the builders and skip the intermediaries.

9. The screen fatigue dividend

Social media usage appears to have peaked around 2022 and has been declining since. Young people are leading the pullback; they grew up online, saw the full cycle, and concluded that endless scroll doesn’t make you happier or smarter. Greg Isenberg calls it the anti-trend: attention shifting back to things that feel real, slow, and intentional.

His list of where the opportunity lives includes slow media formats, private communities, paid memberships that deliver depth, and IRL anything…dinners, meetups, shared experiences.

The internet’s oldest assumption, that more engagement equals more value, is breaking. What replaces it are spaces that make people feel grounded, informed, and connected.

Note: The data is self-reported, so treat the direction rather than the precise numbers as the signal.

10. The farm is the story

Agritourism, an $8 billion market today, is one form of what Isenberg's anti-trend looks like in the travel industry. By 2033, it will reach $21 billion, growing at nearly 12% annually. Ben Wolff explains why. 99% of consumers want transparency in fresh food sourcing. Farm hotels skip the certifications and the supply chain documentation because guests walk into the field and see it themselves. Visual verification builds trust instantly, and trust justifies premium pricing in a way that a sustainability claim on a menu never could.

The properties leading this category have figured out what Wolff calls the “seed-to-soul” continuum. The farm dictates the menu, the spa treatments, the educational experiences. Blackberry Farm in Tennessee, Babylonstoren in South Africa, The Newt in Somerset. High-margin F&B from hyper-local ingredients, beekeeping workshops, on-site retail, large-format events.

The model is also bleeding into residential real estate. Agrihoods (master-planned communities built around working farms) are one of the fastest-growing ideas in residential development, with 200 already operating across 28 states in the US.

The common thread across all of it is transparency, wellness, community, connection to the land. Guests can feel the difference between treating this as core product or using it as a sustainability marketing claim.

PS. Adding a second brain for fundraising

I’ve added a new mode to the Travel Tech Essentialist Copilot: pitch-deck review. It’s the same thinking partner for product and growth, but now it can also pressure-test your fundraising story.

When you share a deck or have a fundraising question, it switches gears and reviews it through the frameworks of the most influential Silicon Valley VCs, flags common mistakes, scores the strength of the pitch, and suggests rewrites and structural improvements. But more importantly, it diagnoses what’s underneath: unclear positioning, weak traction, or a story that doesn’t hold together.

Go ahead, share your deck and ask it to rate it, identify what’s weak, and how to improve it.

Try the Copilot

Travel Tech Essentialist Job Board

New companies on the job board: Navan and Stay22.

• Navan is hiring across sales, revenue operations, strategy, product, and data roles in the US and Europe, with a strong focus on go-to-market and commercial teams. See all open roles here.

• Stay22 is building out its Montreal team across product, engineering, data, operations, and business roles. See all open roles here.

→ Explore all 2030 open roles on the Travel Tech Essentialist Job Board.

• Navan | Vice President, Solutions Consulting | New York City | $244k - $325k

• Airalo | Quality Assurance Engineer, Roaming | Europe; Africa; Middle East; Brazil

• The Hotels Network | Partnerships Manager | Fort Worth, TX; Dallas, TX | $81k - $100k

• Plug and Play | Venture Associate | Sunnyvale, CA

📩 Subscribe to the Travel Tech Jobs newsletter.

If you like Travel Tech Essentialist, please consider sharing it with your friends or colleagues. If you’re not yet subscribed, join us here:

Subscribed

And, as always, thanks for trusting me with your inbox.

Mauricio Prieto